on 2019/04/19
Tesis que afirman que Jesús nunca existió y el Cristianismo es un invento de los Romanos.
Jesús – Hermes – Buddha – Krishna – Horus – Heracles – Adonis
https://www.puebloconsciente.com/eclecticismo-de-jesus/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RBg-WYvYfM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUxztuywGDQ
10 Proofs That Jesus Never Existed
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mistakes_of_Jesus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SfBmIAx20M
10 Proofs That Jesus Never Existed – YouTube
Transcript:
(00:07) There are billions of people who believe in Jesus, not just as a historical figure, but as someone divine, someone who walked the earth, performed miracles, and died for sins. But what if he never existed? What if this central figure of one of the world’s largest religions was entirely invented, not just misunderstood or exaggerated, fully imagined? This might sound shocking at first, but when you remove the fear, strip away tradition, and just look at the evidence, or more accurately, the lack of it, a very different picture
(00:40) begins to form. Not a blurred photo, a blank canvas. Start with the most basic question. Where’s the historical record? Not church writings, not religious texts, independent sources, neutral records. You won’t find them. There are no Roman records that confirm Jesus ever lived, though Rome kept detailed notes on events far less significant than someone claiming to be the son of a god.
(01:06) A man causing political unrest in Judea would have left a footprint, not a vague rumor centuries later. A proper arrest, trial, execution. These things would be recorded. Crucifixion wasn’t rare. It was a public event. Yet, not one Roman document from that era mentions this man. None. That silence is telling.
(01:26) People bring up Josephus, a Jewish historian. But if you look closely, the passage that mentions Jesus is widely considered a forgery. Even Christian scholars quietly admit that section was tampered with. Some parts are so obviously written in a Christian voice that it’s hard to believe it fooled anyone for this long.
(01:45) A Jew like Josephus would not have called Jesus the Christ. That’s not a historical note. That’s a profession of faith. Then there’s Tacitus, another Roman historian, but his mention comes nearly a century after Jesus supposedly died. And even that short line could have been based on hearsay, not direct evidence. It’s like saying Elvis existed because someone wrote about him in 2060.
(02:07) Not compelling. Now, think about this. Not a single text from the time Jesus supposedly lived talks about him. No letters, no scrolls, no graffiti, nothing. The gospels were written decades after his alleged death. And the earliest one, Mark, doesn’t even mention the virgin birth or the resurrection at the end. Those were added later.
(02:27) Even Paul, who wrote before the gospels, never describes a living, breathing Jesus. He never quotes him. He never says he met him. He talks about visions, spiritual encounters, revelations, not conversations or meals, not cities they traveled to together, just dreams and voices. If someone told you they met a person in a vision, would you believe that person existed in real life? When you remove the lens of faith and treat the Jesus story like any other historical claim, the foundation crumbles fast. The story follows a
(03:00) pattern almost too perfectly. Born of a virgin, wise as a child, performs miracles, dies young, comes back. That script was already in circulation long before Christianity. Horus, Mithris, Dionis, same core plot, different names. It’s not just that the Jesus story fits a mythological mold.
(03:24) It’s that it fits too well. The traits assigned to him are not just suspiciously convenient. They’re recycled. Virgin births, star in the sky, followers, betrayal, death, resurrection. It’s like someone copied an old myth and changed the names. If it were fiction, it would be called derivative. Now look at where Jesus supposedly performed miracles.
(03:46) Small towns, unrecorded places, in front of poor, uneducated followers, never in a stadium, never in front of Roman officials, never on record. And somehow these massive supernatural events left no physical trace, not even one contemporary eyewitness report. Walk through Jerusalem today and you’ll find more evidence of Roman plumbing than of Jesus. Think about that.
(04:11) Pipes and drains survived. But the greatest man in history left no sandals, no robe, no written word, not even a tomb we can verify. Every so-called relic has been debunked. The shroud of Trin, the pieces of the cross, the crown of thorns. They’re all late editions marketed like souvenirs. That’s not history. That’s merchandise.
(04:35) Religions often grow from the lives of real people, but sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they’re built from stories, visions, legends. That’s what we see here. A story that starts vague and grows with time. Gets cleaner, more magical, more useful. The Jesus of the earliest texts is minimal. The Jesus of later texts is divine.
(04:55) That’s not biography. That’s myth in motion. What makes this even more clear is the timeline of belief. The early Christians didn’t all agree on who or what Jesus was. Some groups believed he was just a spirit. Others thought he never had a physical body at all. If he had truly lived, there wouldn’t be such confusion.
(05:14) They’d point to memories, not argue over theories. You’re told there were 12 disciples. But these men, supposedly close friends of Jesus, left no personal writings, not one letter, not one diary entry. You’d think someone who walked with the son of God, would write a few lines about it, but they didn’t.
(05:33) We hear about them only from others decades later. That’s not direct evidence. That’s folklore. Even the crucifixion scene reads more like a performance than a record. Darkness falling over the land, earthquakes, dead rising from graves. Yet, no one outside the Bible mentions this. No Roman official wrote about it. No Jewish historian.
(05:54) A mass resurrection and it went unnoticed. That defies logic. Christianity didn’t spread because people saw miracles. It spread because of fear, control, and politics. Once Rome adopted it, it became law. Belief wasn’t chosen, it was enforced. Once you attach religion to power, questioning it becomes dangerous.
(06:15) That’s how myths survive. Through silence, not truth. When you ask why there’s no evidence, the answer is simple. There was no event, no man, no life to record. The gaps aren’t accidental. They’re expected when the subject is fictional. This isn’t about disproving a few details. It’s about pointing out the total absence of a man who should have been everywhere.
(06:37) You don’t have to prove he didn’t exist. The burden is on those who claim he did. And that burden has never been met. You can’t build history on belief. You need facts. You need records. You need names, dates, places, not gospels written by anonymous authors decades after the fact. The Jesus story is full of moral messages. No doubt.
(06:57) But a story with morals isn’t the same as a story that’s true. You can admire a tale without confusing it with reality. What matters is understanding how myths are born, how they spread, and why they last. If Jesus existed, we’d know it by more than tradition, more than stained glass and sermons.
(07:16) There would be evidence that stands up to scrutiny. But there isn’t. Not in history, not in archaeology, not in contemporary writings, not anywhere. And the more you study this silence, the louder it becomes. There’s another problem that people overlook. The language of the texts. The Gospels were written in Greek, not Aramaic, which Jesus and his followers supposedly spoke.
(07:39) These were not eyewitness accounts. They were written by educated Greek speakers living outside of Judea. People writing decades later in a different language about a land and culture they didn’t belong to. That’s not how history is recorded. That’s how legends are built. We don’t know who wrote the Gospels. The names Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were added later.
(08:01) The writers never identify themselves, and their accounts don’t even agree with one another. Different genealogies, different birth stories, different timelines, different final words on the cross. If the gospels can’t agree on the details of their own main character, how are they reliable? No one who lived during the time Jesus supposedly lived wrote anything about him.
(08:22) Pho of Alexandria was a Jewish philosopher who lived in the right place at the right time. He wrote volumes about Judaism, about messianic figures, about strange teachers and miracle workers, but not a word about Jesus. Not one mention. That’s not a small oversight. That’s a major hole. Think about this, too. Bethlehem, the birth story, was created to fulfill a prophecy.
(08:47) But Nazareth, the town where Jesus supposedly grew up, didn’t even exist at the time. Archaeologists have found no evidence of a settlement there in the first century. You can’t grow up in a town that hasn’t been built yet. The more you dig, the less you find. A real person leaves real marks. Birth records, mentions in letters, official documents, stories from enemies, critics, tax records.
(09:11) But in the case of Jesus, all we have is hearsay, anonymous gospels, and religious writings that were edited over time to fit a growing theology. That’s not a historical trail. That’s a marketing campaign. And it worked. The Jesus story was a perfect product for an empire looking to unify its people.
(09:30) It gave the poor hope, the powerful control, and the clergy endless authority. Once belief was linked with salvation, questioning it became dangerous. Heresy was punished. Doubt was buried. Libraries were burned. That’s not how truth behaves. That’s how propaganda spreads. The early Christian church didn’t grow because everyone was convinced by evidence.
(09:51) It grew because it absorbed local customs, wiped out rivals, and became politically useful. Over time, the stories grew bigger, the miracles grander, the theology more rigid. The Jesus of history disappeared, replaced by the Jesus of doctrine. Religious institutions have a long history of reshaping stories to serve their needs.
(10:14) The Council of Nika in 325 CE decided what Christians should believe about Jesus. That’s when doctrines like the Trinity became official. Not because of evidence, but because of votes. Belief won by majority, not merit. That’s not scholarship. That’s politics. The oldest Christian writings don’t even place Jesus on earth.
(10:34) The earliest layer of belief treated Jesus as a heavenly figure revealed through scripture and visions. His story becomes more human over time, not less. A God who slowly becomes a man in the text rather than the other way around. That’s the opposite of what you’d expect if he had really lived. And the resurrection, that’s the heart of the story.
(10:53) But there’s no consistent version of it. Some gospels say the tomb was guarded. Others say it wasn’t. Some say one woman went, others say two. Some say Jesus appeared to crowds. Others say only a few people saw him. These are not minor differences. They are fundamental contradictions. If someone came back from the dead, the world would notice.
(11:13) But the only reports we have are from deeply religious sources decades after the event written in a time when visions and divine appearances were common storytelling tools. No court records, no Roman accounts, no independent verification, just belief passed down. When people say Jesus changed the world, they’re right.
(11:35) But that’s not proof he existed. Big myths can shape history. They don’t need to be real to be powerful. The Trojan War inspired generations of culture. That doesn’t mean Achilles was a real person. Stories shape societies whether they’re true or not. Even in modern times, people create imaginary figures with real consequences.
(11:56) Think of cult leaders inventing prophecies or founders writing holy books they claim were revealed. If those movements survived long enough, their origin stories become sacred history. Even if they started with a lie. The argument that Jesus must have existed because Christianity spread quickly doesn’t hold up either. Islam grew just as fast. So did Mormonism.
(12:17) Speed of growth doesn’t mean truth. It means the story was appealing. It resonated. It gave people something to follow. That’s sociology, not archaeology. Some people try to point to artwork or relics. But the earliest Christian art doesn’t even depict Jesus as a person. He’s shown as a symbol, a lamb, a shepherd, a fish.
(12:37) It took hundreds of years before a standardized image of Jesus even appeared. That’s a clue. It means the visual idea of Jesus was shaped long after the belief was. And still to this day, no one can show you a contemporary image. not one drawing, statue, or carving from the time he supposedly lived. And this is a man who’s said to have attracted thousands.
(13:00) He supposedly overturned temple tables, healed the sick, raised the dead. Yet, nothing was recorded at the time. That absence matters. In fact, many of the sayings attributed to Jesus weren’t unique. They were common among Jewish rabbis, Greek philosophers, and earlier religious movements. The golden rule, for example, predates Jesus by centuries.
(13:22) The sermon on the mount contains phrases already found in previous texts. The teachings weren’t revolutionary. They were recycled. Religious defenders say absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence. But when something should leave evidence and doesn’t, that absence becomes meaningful. If someone claimed there was a famous doctor who cured thousands in New York in 1995, but no one remembers him, no hospitals have records, and no patients can be found, would you believe the story? Now, multiply that by 2,000 years. Add the layers of theological
(13:54) editing. Add centuries of war, suppression, and rewriting. The result is a legend that looks deep, but rests on air. A story that survives not because it’s true, but because it’s been told so many times that people stopped questioning it. Jesus might be the most believed in person who never existed. And that’s not by accident.
(14:15) It’s the result of centuries of careful mythbuilding, suppression of critics and emotional conditioning. Once belief is tied to identity, logic becomes the enemy. And once doubt is labeled sin, asking questions becomes dangerous. But questions matter. Evidence matters. If you ask for proof and all you’re given is scripture, that’s not a historical answer. That’s a circular argument.
(14:38) That’s faith trying to pass as fact. The truth is, there are more reasons to doubt the existence of Jesus than to accept it and not fringe reasons, not conspiracy theories, just simple historical logical observation. No birth certificate, no writings, no eyewitness accounts, no Roman documentation, no physical evidence, no consistency in the stories, no agreement among early believers, no independent confirmation, no record outside the faith.
(15:10) The silence isn’t small, it’s overwhelming. Think about how many ordinary people from ancient history we still know about. merchants, soldiers, farmers, people who weren’t followed by crowds, who didn’t perform miracles, who didn’t spark global religions. And yet, their names survive. Their homes, coins, letters, even shopping lists have been uncovered.
(15:32) They were not divine. They were not worshiped, but they left a trace. Jesus, on the other hand, left nothing. A figure this important should be easy to confirm. But the more you search, the more you realize the story doesn’t hold. Every angle leads to silence, contradiction, or fabrication. The trail starts cold and never heats up.
(15:52) That’s not what you expect from a real person. That’s what you expect from a myth slowly formed by people who needed a savior and were willing to create one. Even the timing of the story raises questions. Jesus supposedly lived during a time of growing tension in Judea, a time of messianic expectations, a time when many men claimed divine authority.
(16:12) His story fits neatly into that era, but also competes with others who were far better documented. There were other messiahs, and we know about them. We know where they lived, what they said, and how they died. But not Jesus. The Jesus of history is a ghost. The Jesus of belief is a construct, a theological puzzle pieced together from older myths, stitched into a political tool, and polished by centuries of tradition.
(16:39) The result is convincing, but only if you don’t ask questions. If you study other mythologies, you’ll notice the same pattern. Start with a vague figure. Add miracles. Give them a divine origin. Surround them with loyal followers. End with a dramatic death. Promise a return. It’s a formula, not a biography.
(16:58) The early church understood this. That’s why they needed councils to decide which texts were official and which weren’t. They had to choose which stories to keep, which to cut, which to brand as heresy. And all of it happened long after Jesus supposedly lived. The version people follow today is not even the original one.
(17:18) It’s the approved one shaped by power. There are gospel texts that were left out, dozens of them. Some show a very different Jesus, a teacher, not a god. A man who speaks in riddles, not one who promises salvation. Those texts were buried, burned, or labeled dangerous. The early church didn’t want a debate. It wanted control.
(17:38) If Jesus had truly existed, there would be no need for all this filtering. No need to decide which version to accept. History doesn’t need an editor, but mythology does. And what about the miracles? Walking on water, feeding thousands with a few loaves, raising the dead. These are the kinds of claims that cry out for attention.
(17:59) If even one of them were witnessed by an educated observer and recorded independently, it would change everything. But that never happened. Not once. These stories appear only in texts written decades later in a religious context by unknown authors with no external support. The same kinds of stories are found in countless other traditions.
(18:20) Miracles are not proof of truth. They’re a common feature of mythmaking. The resurrection is the final stroke. A man comes back to life. appears to his followers, then ascends into the sky. It reads like the climax of a well-written drama. But even the gospels don’t agree on what happened. Different people, different places, different times, a miracle that changed the world.
(18:43) And yet, no two stories can get it straight. And even more puzzling, no one else noticed. No Roman report, no temple record, no citizen testimony. A man defeats death and the city carries on like nothing happened. That kind of silence says more than words ever could. People will say, «But faith doesn’t need proof.» That’s true, but history does.
(19:04) If you claim that someone walked the earth, taught, healed, died, and rose again, you are making a historical claim. And historical claims require evidence. Stories written long after the fact don’t count, especially when they are the only source. In any other field, this standard would be laughed out. Archaeologists wouldn’t accept a rumor as evidence of a buried city.
(19:27) Historians wouldn’t accept a single anonymous letter as proof of a war. Scientists wouldn’t accept an old book as evidence of a phenomenon. But with Jesus, the rules change. Faith replaces facts. Stories replace sources. And when you step back and look at the full picture, the conclusion becomes clear. The Jesus figure as described in the New Testament never existed.
(19:50) There may have been a preacher, a rebel, a wandering teacher who inspired stories. But the man who turned water into wine, who calmed storms, who rose from the dead, that man never walked the earth. That man is a literary invention. The proof isn’t found in one argument. It’s found in the total absence of reliable data, in the contradictions, in the political motivations, in the mythological patterns, in the deliberate shaping of a narrative to fit theological goals.
(20:18) The belief in Jesus didn’t begin with history. It began with hope, with vision, with theology. And then it was passed down, refined, reinforced, and protected. Not because it was true, but because it was useful. Religion often survives not because of what it proves, but because of what it promises. It promises life after death, forgiveness, purpose, and people are willing to believe almost anything to get those promises.
(20:47) But that doesn’t make the story real. You don’t need faith to ask questions. You just need honesty. And when you look honestly at the evidence for Jesus, you don’t find a man. You find a myth carefully built, slowly expanded, and fiercely defended. The truth doesn’t fear investigation. It welcomes it. But the Jesus story falls apart the moment it’s examined.
(21:08) Not because of malice, not because of bias, but because the facts were never there to begin with. And in the end, the silence around Jesus speaks louder than any sermon.